If you are new to the Band, occult imagery posts are shorter looks at the background and patterns in occult images. For more posts on occult symbolism, click here. For an introduction to the Band and the Dismantling Postmodernism series, click the featured post to the right or check out the archive.
Other links: The Band on Gab; The Band on Oneway
Other links: The Band on Gab; The Band on Oneway
Occult posts focus on patterns of deception or wrongness - inadequate explanations, strange attitudes to animals, fake metaphysics - because occultists are unreliable even when they are trying to be honest. Misleading talk is cheap, but a track record is inescapable if you know what to look for. The Band is empirical by nature, because observation and logical analysis are the only way to build verifiable knowledge without venturing into questions of faith. One central pattern has come up so often in the occult and globalism that it deserves its own breakdown. This is the Satanic Inversion, or behaving/ speaking/believing as if reality or the truth were its opposite to achieve personal desires.
Human body circumscribed by a pentagram from Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa's Libri tres de occulta philosophia (Three Books of Occult Philosophy), Ch. 27, Book 2, 15th century
Reversals are common in occult symbolism because evil can't create, it can only pervert and distort. Some occult leaders are clever but their followers are by necessity cognitively limited, meaning simple twists on common symbols are most likely to be understood.
The pentagram was a symbol for the metaphysical nature of the human body, with the mind or spirit at the top? The Satanists invert it.
The upside-down cross speaks for itself, unless it's the "Cross of St. Peter". Only one of these two wizards heads the Catholic church.
The theology of replacing the symbol of the Redeemer with a human office is iffy, to put it mildly, and papal choices in seating have a bit of a track record. On the other hand, it is for the "youth".
The theology of replacing the symbol of the Redeemer with a human office is iffy, to put it mildly, and papal choices in seating have a bit of a track record. On the other hand, it is for the "youth".
The name Satanic Inversion can be confusing because it carries a rhetorical charge. An inversion is the reversal or opposite of a thing, like the yin to the yang. The adjective Satanic is not a claim that all occultists and globalists actively worship the Christian concept of the Devil. Many do, but that's beside the point. We are referring to a pattern of behavior that has many faces but the same root: a deceitful inversion of reality with no regard for the consequences for some personal gain.
James Northcote, Romeo and Juliet, Act 5, Scene 3, 1790, oil on canvas, Folger Shakespeare Library
Romeo and Juliet get caught up in a web of deception with tragic consequences. They didn't intend to deceive each other, but wound up dead all the same.
It is essential to remain aware of the difference between specific surface appearance and the structure of the larger pattern. In this case, deceitful does not necessarily mean an intent to deceive, although it can (specific case), but only an objectively false claim or set of claims (general pattern). Whether someone is deliberately lying has no relevance as to whether their fake reality is based on things that aren't true.
Not all "gain" is the sadistic domination that comes to mind when the word Satanic is used. Falsely reclassifying the restlessness of boys as a disease created windfall for big pharma and other parasitic industries behind the mask of "objective" Science! There is no tyrant in the spotlight here. But swapping pathology for normalcy - harmfully inverts reality for profit.
The word Satanic is a metaphor because it uses the story of Satan's rebellion as a comparison for a whole universe of self-willed sociopathy. But there is more to this than just a resemblance between two things. As the Band has shown on several occasions (click for Satanic postmodernism or an occult take), Satan is the archetype or primordial example of rejecting reality for self-deluded desire.
It is easy to get caught up in the image of Satan, but this has been changing for centuries. Consider the following images from an earlier post:
 |
Clockwise from top left:
Illustration of the devil in the Codex Gigas, f 290 r, 13th century, from the Benedictine monastery of Podlažice, National
Library of Sweden
Master L. Cz., The Temptation of Christ (detail), circa 1500, engraving, 22.6 x 16.9 cm
Thomas Lawrence, Satan Summoning his Legions (detail), 1797, oil on canvas, 432 x 274 cm, Royal Academy Collection, London
Franz Stuck, Lucifer,1890, oil on canvas, 161 cm × 152.5 cm, National Gallery for Foreign Art, Sofia
George Frederic Watts, Satan, 1847, oil on canvas, 198.1 x 132.1 cm, Watts Gallery, Guildford
|
Modern Satanists even claim to be atheist and deny the existence of immaterial beings! But these are all just representations - ways to express a concept in ways that are comprehensible to the target audience.
What is the concept?
Satan "rebels" against God, but God isn't a guy like a cruel overseer or corrupt ruler that can be overthrown. God is ultimate reality, the alpha and the omega, the substructure of all that can be or not be. The Satanic misconception is that their feelings define or can redefine what really is - like chalk words transmuting the substance of a blackboard. Its this elevation of raw emotional desire above reality that makes today's globalist culture Satanic, not the specific percentage of elites that actively worship demonic forces.
Hindenburg begins to fall seconds after catching fire, May 6, 1937
Feelings have little currency when reality bites.
To a materialist, God and Satan are just more metaphor, but even an atheist who is intellectually honest can perceive that there is a natural order to observable reality. If your computer fails to turn on, you seek the identifiable cause. You don't assume that actions are random and you're just lucky that it worked all those other times. Mathematics and other branches of logic consistently account for object relations. Morality appears more subjective, but even this has a social reality that is bigger than the individual.
Left uncoerced, different groups of people coalesce into different social patterns with different outcomes or mores. If organic social organization benefits the population, there is a "moral" duty to defend it from dyscivic, gain-seeking solipsists. We're seeing the alternative.
The core pattern is an inversion where the personal/subjective is elevated above the real/objective. This is logically backwards - inverted - from the fact that we as finite beings are subsets of ultimate reality (however defined), and are therefore by necessity subordinate to it. It precedes us. Wherever we go, reality is already there.
Josephine Wall, The Enchanted Flute
Hendrick Goltzius, Phaeton, 1588
Let's stay materialist. If it is natural for humans to procreate and self-actualize - if "rights" are inalienable - then the domination of others is a willful inversion of human nature for individual gain. Facing this, we have two options: an all-out fight for the Ring of Power where Trotsky winds up on the wrong end of an ice pick, or a collective morality that provides social checks on the dyscivic effects of Satanic ambition.
Low trust or high trust. You can't have both for long, though Satanic types can benefit from psychopathic manipulation while hiding in plain sight in an otherwise high-trust society.
A sophisticated high-trust society needs a functioning morality. This should be obvious. Without common behavioral expectations, even the most minute activity needs to be regulated and policed. This is one reason why globalists love diversity - without the common bonds of social understanding, central control is necessary. Think how many new government entities have been willed into existence with fat budgets to deal with "immigration". It's a sub-empire.
And what is public morality but generally accepted principles and attitudes?
Religion shifts the question of authority to metaphysics and faith. This creates an "external" counterweight to the desire to bathe in dopamine hits from carnal pleasure and material profit. Secular morality pretends the same outcome can be wished into existence with something called human rights, though this has failed empirically as a path to social cohesion. The point is, putting internal desire above external reality works in the natural as well as the supernatural worlds.
Religion shifts the question of authority to metaphysics and faith. This creates an "external" counterweight to the desire to bathe in dopamine hits from carnal pleasure and material profit. Secular morality pretends the same outcome can be wished into existence with something called human rights, though this has failed empirically as a path to social cohesion. The point is, putting internal desire above external reality works in the natural as well as the supernatural worlds.
The supernatural is where the inversion becomes occult.
This pattern is easy to miss because the individual cases can be so different in their intensity. Sacrificing to Moloch or ritually binding spirits are obvious examples of trying to bend reality to your will. On the other hand, so is
This pattern is easy to miss because the individual cases can be so different in their intensity. Sacrificing to Moloch or ritually binding spirits are obvious examples of trying to bend reality to your will. On the other hand, so is
There is no religious justification of this, nor is there a scientific one.
So what are the forces at work here?
The underlying pattern is that the individual speaks reality into existence. It's magic or Magick or whatever. Returning to our pattern, God's creative act is referred to in the Bible as the Logos or Word.
Jan Sadeler I after Crispijn van den Broeck, Creation! Separation of Light and Darkness, 1585, for de Jode’s Thesaurus sacrarum historiarum Veterus et Novi Testamenti
Speaking reality is literally putting oneself in the place of God. This creative power has always been the explicit goal of occultists from at least the time of the Renaissance magus. This is itself a Biblical term for this sort of sinister power, though occultists like to reverse this as well. So the fellow travelers are Simon Magus and fallen Lucifer. Satanic inversions.
We can see the same pattern in the purely material world as well.
If telling the truth is the most accurate possible account of reality, falsehood is the willful inversion. Other than a small number of clinically mentally ill, people lie to benefit themselves in some way - reputation, avoidance, social benefit, etc. The point of the lie is to get people to act as if the false reality was real - literally to speak reality into existence in terms of outcome. Lets look at it graphically.
Eric Armusik, The Temptation Of Christ, 2011
It is an ironic truth that Father of Lies is a title he comes by honestly.
Once you become aware of the pattern, it's everywhere. Postmodernism - that words have no meaning, that reality is subjective, and that personal experience is relevant to factual accuracy - is the "philosophical" expression of this fundamental deceit. Consider how globalists seek to obliterate objective difference, suppress free inquiry, and oppose any form of organic community or traditional morality. And what do they offer instead? Rigid hierarchies that regiment every aspect of life with murderous force that are built around centralized nodes of control. There is no better system for the Satanic inverter who wishes to put their will to dominate over all constraint. Totalitarian heirarchies are catnip for power-seeking psychopaths, and the bigger the system, the more psychopathic the winner.
It is an ironic truth that Father of Lies is a title he comes by honestly.
Once you become aware of the pattern, it's everywhere. Postmodernism - that words have no meaning, that reality is subjective, and that personal experience is relevant to factual accuracy - is the "philosophical" expression of this fundamental deceit. Consider how globalists seek to obliterate objective difference, suppress free inquiry, and oppose any form of organic community or traditional morality. And what do they offer instead? Rigid hierarchies that regiment every aspect of life with murderous force that are built around centralized nodes of control. There is no better system for the Satanic inverter who wishes to put their will to dominate over all constraint. Totalitarian heirarchies are catnip for power-seeking psychopaths, and the bigger the system, the more psychopathic the winner.
Rewarding feelings over reason? Immediate gratification over healthy communities? Squandering other people's money over skin in the game?
Reality can be cruel, and in the end, we all "lose" the battle in this world. But whether your priorities are focused on a different place or you see this world as all we have, the fundamental choice for civilization remains the same. Do you proceed from physical reality and human nature, or do you seek to manipulate reality to exploit others for personal gain? What's the goal?
No comments:
Post a Comment